by Marianne Wilburn

latterly , C.L. Fornari challenged garden writersto consider the way in which we portray the act of horticulture .   She asked us to discuss whether our tendency to extol the virtue ( meditation , creativity , use ) might be greater than our desire to severalize the truth about the work ( sweat , dirt , hernia ) ; and if the mod concept of “ uncongenial marketing , ” that has so lately and successfully been foisted on a war-ridden public ( ie . ‘ Such - and - such is operose . Get over it . ’ ) might draw in and keep on more gardener than tiptoeing around the proverbial tulips and losing our audience to scrapbooking the moment things get tough .

Though I do discontinue short of daring my reader to put on their crowing - miss panty and get out there , there is the decided possibility that I belong to the latter camp . While constantly proclaiming a profound affection for a pastime that connects us solidly and tenderly to the miracle of life-time – child or grownup , prince or pauper – I am about as far from a odorous - telling enchantress as Christopher Lloyd was from Martha Stewart .

Wounds received on the battlefield should be shown, not hidden.

Wounds received on the battlefield should be shown, not hidden.

wound receive on the battlefield should be shown , not hidden .

I do not wait for an annual Festivus celebration to loudly and clearly air my score about the general state of affairs in my garden , nor do I persist silent over occasional periods of confusion , insufficiency , enfeeblement and surety that I do n’t know what the hell on earth I ’m doing out there after twenty years of doing it .   In fact , if anyone come away from my column feel like this whole endeavour is just a manner of walking in the commons , then they are no doubt people who , all grounds to the opposite , feel that having children would bother them only a slight morsel on a Saturday dark , and I wash my hand of them .

But is this working ?   Well , let me answer by asking if the opposite is work . Every time I see commit my punch and glossing over the blood , stew and tear , I invariably talk to someone who is convinced that they are a failure in the garden because it does n’t measure up to all the poster , sharing and tweet go on out there .   Result : they lose , and so does our order .

willburn rant2

In the digital historic period , “ armchair gardening ” has taken on a whole unexampled attribute . mass are inundated with gross gardening life style in a way that feels far more real than those portrayed in traditional medium – for the simple reasonableness that , unlike traditional media , they areconstantly , visually connected . Without significance to be , they are ever - so - slowly break from the actual process .   They can trap and post and share idea after tall idea – feeling part of that world without ever needing totouchit . Thus , when the trowel is lastly picked up , the elbow grease ask is so consuming , and the chasm between ‘ idealistic ’ and ‘ genuine ’ so vast , that many give up .   They are never able to get in touch with the decimal point where the benefits of that hard work become obvious .

The digital years has given us some incredible opportunity as gardener , such as the ability to :

And let ’s not even get started on the miracle that is give-and-take processing and spreadsheet engineering .

But with these nifty gift come great pitfall , such as :

So , how should we approach our audience as garden communicator ? Many of us have been garden for many years , and the above pitfalls are obvious to us , but newer generation are coming of old age in this era and finding it laborious to discriminate themselves from their devices – and the literal study of gardening means two hired hand in the dirt for hours at a prison term .   If their twist get them out into the garden , only to regain the world is n’t quite as easy , instantaneous and Photoshopped as they were led to believe … we will mislay them .

I say , truth above all .   Truth in your photographs .   Truth in your defeat .   trueness in the amount of work it use up you to create something so unique and so breathless that you ca n’t terminate gaze at it .   Truth .   If that ’s ‘ uncongenial marketing ’ I think we owe it to our reader to give them the good , the defective and the ugly so they realise just how good ‘ near ’ can be when they unexpectedly find it .

Bloggers , broadcasters , communicatorsandreaders : what say you ?

Marianne Willburn is a garden columnist and self-employed person author gardening in Northern Virginia .   you’re able to take more atThe Small Town Gardeneror follow her work onFacebook .